Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, ' V. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., VERIZON VIRGINIA INC., AND VERIZON SOUTH INC., Defendants-Appellants. 2012-1479 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-024& Judge Raymond A. Jackson. ON MOTION ORDER Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Virginia Inc., and Verizon South Inc. (collectively “Verizon") request this appeal be consolidated with appeal n0s. 2011-1538, -1567, 2012-1129, and -1201 or, in the alternative, dismissed. ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS V. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS 2 The present appeal cannot be consolidated with the appeals listed above, because those appeals have been fully briefed and argued before a merits panel. Further, it appears that Verizon seeks to appeal an unappealable interlocutory order. In its June 25, 2012 order, the district court explained that "Verizon has not represented to the Court that it intends to provide Ac- tiveVideo or the Court with the information necessary to determine if Verizon is in compliance with the Court’s [permanent injunction] Order." As a result,.the district court directed Verizon to provide documents pertaining to Verizon’s allegedly new and non-infringing device as well as to provide answers to interrogatories concerning that device. Discovery orders are not final decisions and are, therefore, generally unappealable until final judgment has issued. See Connaught Laboratories, Inc._ v. Smith- Kline Beecham P.L.C., 165 F.3d 1368, 1369 (Fed. Cir.1999). Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. Verizon is directed to show cause, within the next 30 days, as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdic- tion. FoR THE CoURT AUG 2 9 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Michael J. Lyons, Esq. Michael K. Kellogg, Esq. 825 u.s.¢nun¥l»':§‘?»a\sp@n THEFEDERAL C{RCU!T AUG 2 9 2012 JAN HORBA|.V CLERK