Opinion by
Oliver, P. J.In accordance with stipulation of counsel a “Nord-enson Camera” similar to that the subject of United States v. Zeiss (27 C. C. P. A. 12, C. A. D. 54) was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as claimed.
Opinion by
Oliver, P. J.In accordance with stipulation of counsel a “Nord-enson Camera” similar to that the subject of United States v. Zeiss (27 C. C. P. A. 12, C. A. D. 54) was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as claimed.