Opinion by
Kincheloe, J.In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Penn (27 C. C. P. A. 242, C. A. D. 93) the mats in question were held dutiable at 90 percent under paragraph 1529 (a) as claimed.
Opinion by
Kincheloe, J.In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Penn (27 C. C. P. A. 242, C. A. D. 93) the mats in question were held dutiable at 90 percent under paragraph 1529 (a) as claimed.