Opinion by
Keefe, J.In accordance with stipulation of cohnsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the merchandise was held dutiable as earthenware at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
Opinion by
Keefe, J.In accordance with stipulation of cohnsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the merchandise was held dutiable as earthenware at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.