Opinion by.
Keefe, J.In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D, 303) the Rockingham earthenware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
Opinion by.
Keefe, J.In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D, 303) the Rockingham earthenware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.