Opinion by
Oliver, P. J.It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consisting of fancy woven luncheon table goods, fringed, linen and wool, wool chief value, is the same as the articles the subject of Akawo v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 370, C. D. 498). In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 90 percent under paragraph 1529 as claimed. The protests were overruled in all other respects.