FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 13 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50402
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:11-cr-01287-DMS-1
v.
MEMORANDUM *
CHRISTIAN HARTZ FAULK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 6, 2012
Pasadena, California
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, WATFORD and HURWITZ, Circuit
Judges.
1. Warrants of removal are admissible under the public records hearsay
exception, see United States v. Hernandez-Rojas, 617 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.
1980), and we’ve permitted their use as proof of alienage, see United States v.
*
This disposition isn’t appropriate for publication and isn’t precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
page 2
Sotelo, 109 F.3d 1446, 1449 (9th Cir. 1997); see also United States v. Hernandez-
Herrera, 273 F.3d 1213, 1217–18 (9th Cir. 2001).
2. The prosecutor’s statement during closing argument that U.S. citizens
aren’t placed in removal proceedings didn’t “undermine the fundamental fairness
of the trial and contribute to the miscarriage of justice.” United States v. Del Toro-
Barboza, 673 F.3d 1136, 1152 (9th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).
3. The district judge did not err in applying a sentencing enhancement for
“intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily
injury.” See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6). The alien in United States v. Torres-Flores,
502 F.3d 885, 889 (9th Cir. 2007), was hidden behind the back seat in the cab of a
pickup truck. Here, the court found the alien was “locked in” a tiny compartment
with “jagged edges” and “would not have the ability to exit on [her] own.” Faulk’s
conduct was akin to transporting an alien in the trunk of a car, which is one of the
examples listed in the Guidelines application notes as triggering the enhancement.
See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1 cmt. n.5.
AFFIRMED.