United States v. Francisco Galaz-Chaparro

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 14 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10145 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-03595-CKJ- CRP-1 v. FRANCISCO GALAZ-CHAPARRO, MEMORANDUM * Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 10, 2012 ** Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Francisco Galaz-Chaparro appeals from the 63–month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Galaz-Chaparro contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his personal situation, his unique characteristics, and the true nature of his non-violent criminal history. The record reflects that under the totality of the circumstances, including Chaparro’s most recent re-entry only four months after his last deportation, the sentence within the Guidelines range is not substantively unreasonable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).1 AFFIRMED. 1 Galaz-Chaparro’s motion, filed on August 21, 2012, requesting an extension of time to file his reply brief is granted. The reply brief received on August 21, 2012, is deemed filed.