United States v. Roxanne Eckles

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7125 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROXANNE KIMARIE ECKLES, a/k/a Sld Dft 5:05CR9-4-V, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-4) Submitted: September 7, 2012 Decided: September 17, 2012 Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roxanne Kimarie Eckles, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas A. O’Malley, Maria Kathleen Vento, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roxanne Kimarie Eckles appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Eckles’ motion for a transcript at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eckles, No. 5:05-cr-00009-RLV- DCK-4 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2