Scholz Aluminium GMBH v. Gearbulk, Inc.

Case: 11-15501 Date Filed: 09/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________

No. 11-15501
________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-01330-RAL-MAP

SCHOLZ ALUMINIUM GMBH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEARBULK, INC.,
ARROW TERMINALS, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________

(September 19, 2012)

Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this bailment action, after a bench trial the district court concluded that
 Case: 11-15501 Date Filed: 09/19/2012 Page: 2 of 2

the contract between Scholz Aluminum GmbH and Arrow Terminals, Inc.,

concerning the proper procedure for releasing aluminum billets stored at Arrow’s

facility was ambiguous, took parol evidence, and entered final judgment for

appellees Gearbulk, Inc., and Arrow Terminals, Inc. After thorough review, we

can discern no error in the district court’s interpretation of the contract between

the parties or the district court’s findings of fact. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

2