Opinion by
Cline, J.It was stipulated and agreed that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Mutual Supply Co. v. United States (12 Cust. Ct. 136, C. D. 842). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 775 as modified by T. D. 48075. The protests were sustained to this extent.