*240Opinion by
Kincheloe, J.It appeared from the testimony that certain of the merchandise is of the same dutiable character as the umbrella cloth covered by Caesar & Co. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 455, C. D. 515), and other merchandise is of the same dutiable character as that passed upon in id. v. id. (4 Cust. Ct. 34, C. D. 278). The protests were therefore sustained as claimed.