United States v. Uriel Rivera

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 21 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50319 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-03310-BTM v. MEMORANDUM * URIEL ULYSES RIVERA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted September 10, 2012 ** Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Uriel Ulyses Rivera appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to import heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, and 963. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). we affirm. Rivera contends that the district court erred by imposing a 120-month mandatory minimum sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy to import a controlled substance because he did not have knowledge that the controlled substance was heroin or of the quantity of heroin involved. As Rivera concedes, this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir. 2002). We decline Rivera’s request that we call for en banc review to reconsider our precedent on this issue. AFFIRMED. 2 11-50319