UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7457
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID LAMONT BEEKS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:01-cr-00828-HMH-12)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Lamont Beeks, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Lamont Beeks appeals the district court’s orders
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence
reduction and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order denying Beeks’
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Beeks, No. 6:01-cr-00828-HMH-12 (D.S.C.
July 27, 2012).
We also conclude that the district court lacked
authority to entertain Beeks’ motion for reconsideration. See
United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Beeks’
motion for reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2