UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY L. OLVIS, a/k/a Tony,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony L. Olvis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham,
II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony L. Olvis appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his
sentence pursuant to Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and
conclude that the district court properly determined that Olvis
was not eligible for a sentence reduction because Amendment 750
did not lower his Guidelines range. To the extent that Olvis
reasserts the arguments he raised in the district court
regarding the calculation of the drug quantity attributable to
him, those arguments are foreclosed by Dillon v. United States,
130 S. Ct. 2683, 2693-94 (2010). Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Olvis, No. 4:95–cr–00038-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 9, 2012 &
entered May 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2