Seedman International Corp. v. United States

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of certain padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(Note: The following protests were decided by a special second division consisting of Kao, Ford, and Landis, Judges.)