IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 94-20938
(Summary Calendar)
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OSCAR MORENO SUAREZ a/k/a
Oscar De Jesus Moreno,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(USDC No. CR-H-94-0060-4)
- - - - - - - - - -
December 15, 1995
Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant appeals his criminal conviction. He argues that the
Double Jeopardy Clause was violated and that wiretap evidence
should have been suppressed. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's grounds for denying the plea in bar to prosecution
and the motion to suppress. We find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.
Appellant may not adopt arguments that had not yet been made by
persons who are not parties to the instant appeal. Fed. R. App. P.
28(i); United States v. Miles, 10 F.3d 1135, 1138 n.3 (5th Cir.
1993).
AFFIRMED.
2