FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 16 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KRYSTLE MACAPAGAL AGUSTIN, No. 11-71342
Petitioner, Agency No. A094-880-382
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 13, 2012 **
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Krystle Macapagal Agustin, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from
an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her request for a continuance. We
have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
denial of a continuance, Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009),
and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Agustin’s request for a
continuance where she failed to show good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; cf.
Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012-15 (good cause shown for continuance to await
adjudication of I-140 appeal).
Agustin’s request regarding prosecutorial discretion is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 11-71342