United States v. Jose Diaz-Hernandez

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 19 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10643 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00159-NVW v. MEMORANDUM * JOSE DIAZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Joseph M. Hood, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted November 13, 2012 *** Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. Jose Diaz-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Diaz-Hernandez’s counsel has filed a * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Diaz-Hernandez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 11-10643