UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1676
MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS, MD MPH for herself and qui
tam and Ex Rel the government of the Arab Republic of Egypt
and qui tam the United States of America,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; NIMRATA HALEY, as SC’s Governor;
ALAN WILSON, as SC’s Attorney General; KEN ARD, as SC’s
Lieutenant Governor and President of its Senate; GLENN
MCCONNELL, as President pro tempore of SC’s Senate and chair
of its judicial merit selection commission; JEAN TOAL, as
administrative head of all SC’s state courts; SOUTH CAROLINA
GENERAL ASSEMBLY; MARK KEEL, as chief of SC’s State Law
Enforcement Division; KEN LANCASTER, as acting head of SC’s
Department of Public Safety; LEON LOTT, as sheriff of
Richland County SC and warden of the Alvin S. Glenn
Detention Center; JEANETTE MCBRIDE, as Richland County’s
Clerk of Court; WILLIAM NORMAN NETTLES, as US Attorney for
the District of South Carolina; CITY OF COLUMBIA, all solely
officially and for injunctive and qui tam relief; LESLEY
MCALLISTER COGGIOLA, officially as SC’s disciplinary counsel
solely for injunctive relief; JAKE KNOTTS, falsely bearing
the title of SC state senator; DANA TURNER, falsely bearing
the title of Chief Administrative Judge of the City’s
Municipal Court; RANDY SCOTT, falsely bearing the title of
the City’s Chief of Police; MARION HANNA, falsely bearing
the title of CMC judge; KEN GAINES; ROBERT G. COOPER; DAVID
A. FERNANDEZ, supposed attorneys for the city and all their
subordinates who did and or intend to injure plaintiff all
for injunctive relief qui tam damages and other legal
relief,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(3:11-cv-03077-TLW)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, M.D., M.P.H., appeals
the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation to dismiss her complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915 (2006), as well as its orders denying her Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) and 60(b) motions. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s orders. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. South Carolina, No. 3:11-
cv-03077-TLW (D.S.C. March 22, 2012; April 25, 2012; Aug. 13,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3