UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7443
ELI BOSTICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M.J. LAMB, Superintendent; DR. RICHARD BROADWELL,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
C/O R. BRANAM; C/O G. DAVIS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:10-ct-03148-BO)
Submitted: December 21, 2012 Decided: January 7, 2013
Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eli Bostick, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Pharr McCullough,
YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eli Bostick appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies ∗ and the
court’s order denying his Fed. R. Cir. P. 59(e) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Bostick v. Lamb, No. 5:10-ct-03148-BO (E.D.N.C. July 27,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
∗
Although dismissals without prejudice generally are not
appealable, we conclude that the court’s order is a final order.
See Domino Sugar v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,
1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
2