UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7393
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WINZEL DALLAS JACOBS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00319-WO-1; 1:09-cr-00114-
WO-2)
Submitted: December 28, 2012 Decided: January 7, 2013
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Winzel Dallas Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Robert Albert Jamison Lang, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Winzel Dallas Jacobs appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and reducing his sentence to seventy-
two months’ imprisonment. Although the court imposed a sentence
below the original ninety-six month term, it did not reduce
Jacobs’ sentence to the full extent he requested and instead
imposed a sentence above the amended Guidelines range of sixty-
months’ imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. ∗ Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
∗
Although the district court misstated Jacobs’ amended
offense level, the court correctly determined that Jacobs’
amended Guidelines range was sixty months’ imprisonment. We
find no abuse in the district court’s exercise of its discretion
to sentence Jacobs to a sentence above the amended Guidelines
range. Cf. United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.
2010) (applying abuse of discretion standard to review of order
granting or denying a § 3582(c)(2) order).
2