NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE FINJAN, INC.
______________________
2011-1542
(Reexamination No. 90/008,684)
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for appellant.
With him on the brief were LISA KOBIALKA and JAMES R.
HANNAH.
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for Director of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN,
Solicitor, and COKE MORGAN STEWART and ROBERT J.
MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors.
______________________
THIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, AND O’MALLEY, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk