UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7654
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONZEL FREDRICKUS STINSON, a/k/a Shack, a/k/a Shaq,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-20)
Submitted: January 10, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donzel Fredrickus Stinson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donzel Fredrickus Stinson appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction in his sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Stinson, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-20 (Aug. 23, 2012). We deny
Stinson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2