NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 23 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FRANCISCA AGUILAR ROCHA, No. 08-73813
Petitioner, Agency No. A078-638-837
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 18, 2013**
San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, FARRIS, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Rocha petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s denial of
her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) and we deny
the petition.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Board did not abuse its discretion because it gave a reasoned basis for
its decision by stating correctly that Rocha had submitted no evidence showing that
she had a well-founded fear of persecution or that she faces a clear probability of
torture. See Konstantinova v. I.N.S., 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir. 1999).
PETITION DENIED.
2