UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7930
LARRY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
S. WARDEN BODISON; WARDEN W. THOMPSON; CAPTAIN BRITEHART;
GOODWIN GEORGE; LIEUTENANT D. MAGHEE; SERGEANT JOHNSON;
WARDEN HUNTER; SERGEANT WILSON; MR. JON OZMINT; COMMISSARY
STAFF MAHAFFEX; SERGEANT SANFORD; NFN JEFFERSON, Commissary
Staff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief
District Judge. (3:09-cv-03321-MBS-JRM)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Williams filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint in the district court. He appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice for
failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to provide
the court with addresses for the defendants. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the
deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by
the filing of a complaint that satisfies the requirements of the
district court, we conclude that the district court’s order is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local
Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2