Slip Op. 99-31
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
CARNATION ENTERPRISES P. LTD., ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, BEFORE: DiCarlo,
Senior Judge
v.
Consol. Ct.
UNITED STATES, No. 91-11-00826
Defendant.
JUDGMENT ORDER
The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermination in
accordance with this Court’s Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Carnation Enterprises
Ltd., et al. v. United States, Consolidated Court No. 91-11-00826. The Department of
Commerce requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading
Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its
Redetermination of the 1989 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-
specific subsidy rates by revising the rates relating to India’s International Price Reimbursement
Scheme (IPRS). The new company-specific and all other rates applicable to the 1989 period of
review are as follows:
Carnation Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. 16.10%
UMA Iron & Steel Co. 16.22%
Govind Steel 20.36%
Tirupati 20.36%
Consol. Court No.: 91-11-00826 Page 2
Ragunath Prasad Phoolchand 20.36%
All Others 2.50%
These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.
The Court having reviewed the Redetermination Results, Commerce having complied
with the Court’s Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the new rates, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further
ORDERED that the rates listed above shall become the new rates for the 1989 period,
and it is further
ORDERED that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues,
this action is dismissed.
_________________________
Dominick L. DiCarlo
Senior Judge
Dated: New York, New York
April 1, 1999