(concurring). As I explained in my dissent in Milwaukee Police Asso. v. Milwaukee, 92 Wis.2d 145, 165, 285 N.W.2d 119 (1979), I believe the majority errs in concluding that “The de*192fenses listed in secs. 298.10 and 298.11 can be asserted in response to an application to confirm an award under sec. 298.09 without regard to the three-month time limitation of sec. 298.13.”
I am authorized to state that Mr. Justice Day joins in this concurring opinion.