UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2144
DEMARK DIXON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MR. TOM RAMIREZ, US Probation Officer, acting in his own
individual capacity, but under color of Federal Authority;
HALLS AUTOMOTIVE, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00137-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: January 14, 2013 Decided: February 12, 2013
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
DeMark Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Randall
Clair Lenhart, Jr., KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, PC, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
DeMark Dixon appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim and
denying his Rule 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Dixon v. Ramirez, No.
2:12-cv-00137-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. July 18, 2012; Oct. 1, 2012).
We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2