United States v. Maria Toledo-Fierros

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 15 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50584 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-01013-PSG v. MEMORANDUM * MARIA TOLEDO-FIERROS, a.k.a. Mari, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 11, 2013 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. Maria Toledo-Fierros appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 70-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to aid and assist inadmissible aliens to enter the United States, in * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1327. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Toledo-Fierros’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Toledo-Fierros the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Toledo-Fierros has waived her right to appeal her sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 10-50584