United States v. Librado Alvarez-Bajo

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 21 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10143 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:07-CR-01525-JMR v. MEMORANDUM * LIBRADO ALVAREZ-BAJO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Marvin E. Aspen, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted February 11, 2013 *** Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. Librado Alvarez-Bajo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence for illegal reentry * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Marvin E. Aspen, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarez-Bajo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarez-Bajo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 09-10143