UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2445
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HON. GERALD BRUCE LEE, et al,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:12-mc-00041-LO-IDD)
Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Sindram appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motions seeking leave to file a civil action
and requesting a hearing. We affirm.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
Sindram’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s
denial of his motion requesting a hearing, Sindram has forfeited
appellate review of that ruling.
With respect to the court’s ruling denying Sindram’s
motions seeking leave to file, we have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. Hon. Gerald
Bruce Lee, et al, No. 1:12-mc-00041-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 15,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2