Michael Sindram v. Gerald Lee

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2445

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HON. GERALD BRUCE LEE, et al,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:12-mc-00041-LO-IDD)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Sindram appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motions seeking leave to file a civil action

and requesting a hearing. We affirm.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised

in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because

Sindram’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s

denial of his motion requesting a hearing, Sindram has forfeited

appellate review of that ruling.

With respect to the court’s ruling denying Sindram’s

motions seeking leave to file, we have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. Hon. Gerald

Bruce Lee, et al, No. 1:12-mc-00041-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 15,

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2