Marcy Hill v. Sears Roebuck & Co

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 26, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143329 Michael F. Cavanagh 143348 Marilyn Kelly 143633 Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra, MARCY HILL, PATRICIA HILL, and Justices CHRISTOPHER HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 143329 COA: 295071 Macomb CC: 2007-003755-NO SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY, SEARS LOGISTIC SERVICES, INC., EXEL DIRECT, INC. and MERCHANT DELIVERY, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and MARK PRITCHARD and TIMOTHY DAMERON, Defendants-Appellants. and CHARLES R. LINDSEY, ORALIA J. LINDSEY, and ALBERT KIMPE, Defendants. _________________________________________/ MARCY HILL, PATRICIA HILL, and CHRISTOPHER HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 143348 COA: 295071 Macomb CC: 2007-003755-NO SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY, SEARS LOGISTIC SERVICES, INC., MARK PRITCHARD, and TIMOTHY DAMERON, Defendants-Appellees, and EXEL DIRECT, INC. and MERCHANT DELIVERY, INC., Defendants-Appellants, and 2 CHARLES R. LINDSEY, ORALIA J. LINDSEY, and ALBERT KIMPE, Defendants. _________________________________________/ MARCY HILL, PATRICIA HILL, and CHRISTOPHER HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 143633 COA: 295071 Macomb CC: 2007-003755-NO SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY and SEARS LOGISTIC SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Appellants, and EXEL DIRECT, INC., MERCHANT DELIVERY, INC., MARK PRITCHARD, and TIMOTHY DAMERON, Defendants-Appellees, and CHARLES R. LINDSEY, ORALIA J. LINDSEY, and ALBERT KIMPE, Defendants. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the May 24, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the applications or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall include among the issues addressed: (1) whether the defendant installers of the electrical appliance, Mark Pritchard and Timothy Dameron, had a duty to the plaintiffs with respect to the uncapped gas line in their home that was separate and distinct from their contractual duty to properly and safely install the electrical appliance; (2) whether these defendant installers created a new dangerous condition with respect to the uncapped gas line, or made an existing dangerous condition more hazardous; and (3) whether defendants-appellants Sears Roebuck & Company, Sears Logistic Services, Inc., Exel Direct, Inc., and Merchant Delivery, Inc., breached any duty owed to the plaintiffs. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 26, 2011 _________________________________________ t1019 Clerk