Ramco Hartland Llc v. landmark/mansour Development Llc

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 5, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Michael F. Cavanagh 143113 Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra, RAMCO HARTLAND L.L.C., RAMCO RM Justices HARTLAND SC L.L.C., and RAMCO RM HARTLAND DISPOSITION L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Counter- Defendants-Appellees, v SC: 143113 COA: 294877 Oakland CC: 2008-093556-CK LANDMARK/MANSOUR DEVELOPMENT L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee, and HANI MANSOUR, Defendant-Counter- Plaintiff-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for entry of an amended order clarifying that the dismissal of the counterclaim for breach of contract was without prejudice, in view of the fact that the court concluded that the claim was premature. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 5, 2011 _________________________________________ d0928 Clerk