Ramos v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Per CuktaM.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Ber-geN, MiNtubN, Kalirch, Black:, KatzenbaCH, White, GARDNER, HEPPENHETMER. WILLIAMS, ÁCKERSON, JJ. 12. For reversal — Xone.