In re Cato

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged er*16rors or irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.