Reep v. Greyhound Corp.

Weygandt, C. J.,

dissenting. Since the court is of the opinion that the questioned language of the trial court’s charge to the jury is unfortunate and erroneous, it would seem that this unfortunate and erroneous language which has been merely tolerated should now be definitely proscribed and the judgment herein reversed in order that the parties may be accorded a fair retrial free from error.

Bell, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.