Baker v. Sacks

Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus cannot be used to review alleged irregularities in the resentencing of an accused by a court of competent jurisdiction. Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St., 81; Ex parte Hagan, 25 Ohio St., 426.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.