Hanna v. Merlos

Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                   Lansing, Michigan

  June 10, 2009                                                                                                  Marilyn Kelly,
                                                                                                                    Chief Justice

  138743 & (14)                                                                                        Michael F. Cavanagh
                                                                                                       Elizabeth A. Weaver
                                                                                                        Maura D. Corrigan
                                                                                                       Robert P. Young, Jr.
                                                                                                       Stephen J. Markman
  RODNEY HANNA,                                                                                        Diane M. Hathaway,
           Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                           Justices

  v                                                                 SC: 138743
                                                                    COA: 289513
                                                                    Wayne CC: 07-732805-NH
  DARIO MERLOS, DDS,
           Defendant-Appellant.

  _________________________________________/

          On order of the Court, motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The
  application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is
  considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we
  REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. See
  Scarsella v Pollack, 461 Mich 547, 549 (2000). We further ORDER that the trial court
  proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on
  its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the
  stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate
  grounds appear.




                           I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                     foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                           June 10, 2009                       _________________________________________
         p0610                                                                 Clerk