People v. Davenport

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 18, 2009 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice 137419 & (83) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices v SC: 137419 COA: 271366 Presque Isle CC: 05-092269-FC GARY EDWARD DAVENPORT, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. A presumption of prejudice exists when a defendant’s former defense counsel joins the prosecutor’s office that is pursuing the case against the defendant. MRPC 1.9(b), 1.10(b). Such a presumption may be overcome, however, if the prosecutor shows that the attorney who has a conflict of interest was properly screened out from “any participation in the matter.” MRPC 1.10(b)(1). State v McClellan, 179 P3d 825 (Utah App, 2008), on which the Court of Appeals therefore unnecessarily relied, is fully consistent with these principles. The motion to stay is DENIED. I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 18, 2009 _________________________________________ 0311 Clerk