This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
STEPHENS, COGLEY, and DEERWESTER
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
David ROSALESMORALES
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 202200062
_________________________
Decided: 12 July 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Adam M. King
Sentence adjudged 9 November 2021 by a special court-martial con-
vened at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan consisting of a military judge
sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, con-
finement for 210 days, 1 and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Daniel E. Grunert, JAGC, USN
1 Appellant was credited with 135 days of pretrial confinement credit.
United States v. Rosalesmorales, NMCCA No. 202200062
Opinion of the Court
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. 2
However, we note that the Convening Authority’s Action does not accu-
rately reflect a summary of the sentence limitations of the plea agreement. The
summary states merely that confinement is limited to 90 days. However, the
plea agreement limited the sentence for Charge I to 90 days and, also, limited
the sentence for Charge II to 120 days, to run consecutively for a total of 210
days. Nevertheless, the Convening Authority’s Action did approve the sentence
as adjudged. Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-
martial records that correctly reflect the content of his proceeding. 3 In accord-
ance with United States v. Crumpley, 4 we modify the Convening Authority’s
Action and direct that it be included in the record.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
S. TAYLOR JOHNSTON
Acting Clerk of Court
2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
3 United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).
4 Id.
2