Neuhaus v. PEPSI COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY

Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                   Lansing, Michigan

  December 27, 2007                                                                                      Clifford W. Taylor,
                                                                                                                 Chief Justice

  134661                                                                                               Michael F. Cavanagh
                                                                                                       Elizabeth A. Weaver
                                                                                                              Marilyn Kelly
                                                                                                         Maura D. Corrigan
  DAVID P. NEUHAUS,                                                                                    Robert P. Young, Jr.
            Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                        Stephen J. Markman,
                                                                                                                      Justices

  v                                                                 SC: 134661
                                                                    COA: 274960
                                                                    WCAC: 05-000243
  PEPSI COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING
  COMPANY and LUMBERMENS MUTUAL
  CASUALTY COMPANY,
            Defendants-Appellants.

  _________________________________________/

         On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2007 order of
  the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting
  leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on
  leave granted, of whether the WCAC properly awarded an attorney fee on plaintiff’s
  medical benefits award. In answering this question, the Court of Appeals shall consider
  whether the WCAC correctly construed the term “prorate,” as it is used in MCL
  418.315(1). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not
  persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

        We do not retain jurisdiction.




                           I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                     foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                           December 27, 2007                   _________________________________________
           t1219                                                               Clerk