People v. Parsons

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132975 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellant, Stephen J. Markman, Justices v SC: 132975 COA: 273560 Wayne CC: 06-100051-01 36th DC: D06-55281; D06-55282 TODD EMERSON PARSONS, Defendant, and GABRIEL JOHN SEIBT, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/ The application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. On remand, the district court shall determine whether there is a potential conflict of interest sufficient to outweigh the defendant’s right to the counsel of his choice. See Wheat v United States, 486 US 153; 108 S Ct 1692; 100 L Ed 2d 140 (1988); United States v Gonzalez-Lopez, __ US __; 126 S Ct 2557; 165 L Ed 2d 409 (2006). The party seeking disqualification bears the burden of proving how prejudice will result. Kubiak v Hurr, 143 Mich App 465 (1985). The stay of district and circuit court proceedings, ordered on March 6, 2007, is DISSOLVED. WEAVER, J., concurs and states as follows: I concur only in the result of the order to deny leave to appeal and dissolve the stay in the district court and circuit court proceedings, ordered on March 6, 2007, as I am not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed before the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. 2 Further, I note the reasons for Justice Corrigan’s nonparticipation in the case were stated by her in her concurrence in a previous order in this case. People v Parsons, unpublished order of the Supreme Court, entered March 6, 2007 (Docket No. 132975). CORRIGAN, J., not participating. I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 30, 2007 _________________________________________ p0327 Clerk