Legal Research AI

Southfield Jeep, Inc. v. Preferred Auto Sales, Inc.

Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Date filed: 2007-03-28
Citations: 728 N.W.2d 459
Copy Citations
1 Citing Case
Combined Opinion
Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                   Lansing, Michigan

  March 28, 2007                                                                                         Clifford W. Taylor,
                                                                                                                 Chief Justice

  131822                                                                                               Michael F. Cavanagh
                                                                                                       Elizabeth A. Weaver
                                                                                                              Marilyn Kelly
                                                                                                         Maura D. Corrigan
  SOUTHFIELD JEEP, INC., d/b/a SOUTHFIELD                                                              Robert P. Young, Jr.
  CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH-JEEP,                                                                              Stephen J. Markman,
                                                                                                                      Justices
           Plaintiff/Counter Defendant- 

           Appellee, 

  v        	                                                        SC: 131822
                                                                    COA: 256014
                                                                    Macomb CC: 03-002718-CK
                                                                    39th DC: 01-000684-GC
  PREFERRED AUTO SALES, INC., and MARK
  ARMENI, 

            Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs- 

            Appellants. 


  _________________________________________/

          On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2006
  judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in
  lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of
  Appeals. The Court of Appeals erred in finding that the defendant’s failure to appeal the
  district court’s denial of its motion to transfer the case to the circuit court leads to the
  conclusion that defendant either acquiesced in the district court’s decision that the
  damages did not exceed the jurisdictional limit, or chose to forfeit any amount in excess
  of the jurisdictional limit of the district court. Slip op, p 7. Because the district court’s
  denial of the defendant’s motion was interlocutory, the defendant may appeal that
  decision as of right, on entry of a final order by the district court disposing of the case.
  See People v Torres, 452 Mich 43, 59 (1996) (“[A] party in a civil action may raise
  previous interlocutory decisions when it brings an appeal of right from a final order.”);
  MCR Subchapter 7.100 of the Michigan Court Rules. In all other respects, leave to
  appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now
  be reviewed by this Court.




                           I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                     foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                           March 28, 2007                      _________________________________________
           s0321                                                               Clerk