Beyer v. VERIZON NORTH, INC.

Related Cases

MICHIGAN PAY TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION v. Michigan Public Service Commission
T & S Distributors Llc v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co
Lucre Inc v. Verizon North Inc
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, D/B/A Ameritech Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John Engler, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan David A. Svanda, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission Robert B. Nelson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission John G. Strand, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Michigan Public Service Commission, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants. Verizon North Incorporated and Contel of the South, Incorporated, D/B/A Gte Systems of Michigan, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. John Engler, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan David A. Svanda, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission Robert B. Nelson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service Commission John G. Strand, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Michigan Public Service Commission Jennifer M. Granholm, in Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan (00-2174), Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. D/B/A Ameritech Michigan v. John G. Strand and David A. Svanda, Commissioners of the Michigan Public Service Commission, in Their Official Capacities, and Bre Communications, LLC

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131128 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan SHELLY BEYER, BONNIE RIOS, JOE RIOS, Robert P. Young, Jr. and GERALD SZCZEPANIAK, Stephen J. Markman, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, v SC: 131128 COA: 258504 Ingham CC: 03-000433-CZ VERIZON NORTH, INC. and CONTEL OF THE SOUTH, INC., d/b/a GTE SYSTEMS OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 31, 2006 _________________________________________ t1023 Clerk