Tingley v. Wardrop

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128901(91) Michael F. Cavanagh 128907(91) Elizabeth A. Weaver 128909(91) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, III, WILLIAM Q. Justices TINGLEY, and DANIEL R. BRADLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and PROTO-CAM, INC., BEND TOOLING, INC., and TENNINE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v SC: 128901 COA: 243171 Kent CC: 02-003723-NZ ROBERT F. WARDROP, II, WILLIAM J. FISHER III, TODD R. DICKINSON, WARDROP & WARDROP, P.C., DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC, FISHER & DICKINSON, P.C., 900 MONROE LLC, 940 MONROE LLC, PIONEER INCORPORATED, DYKEMA EXCAVATORS, INC., and FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, Defendants, and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS and JOHN H. LOGIE, Defendants-Appellants. _________________________________________/ WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, III, WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, and DANIEL R. BRADLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and PROTO-CAM, INC., BEND TOOLING, INC., and TENNINE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v SC: 128907 COA: 243171 Kent CC: 02-003723-NZ ROBERT F. WARDROP, II, WILLIAM J. FISHER III, TODD R. DICKINSON, WARDROP & WARDROP, P.C., DICKINSON WRIGHT, 2 PLLC, FISHER & DICKINSON, P.C., DYKEMA EXCAVATORS, INC., FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, and JOHN H. LOGIE Defendants, and 900 MONROE LLC, 940 MONROE LLC, and PIONEER INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants. _________________________________________/ WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, III, WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, and DANIEL R. BRADLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and PROTO-CAM, INC., BEND TOOLING, INC., and TENNINE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v SC: 128909 COA: 243171 Kent CC: 02-003723-NZ ROBERT F. WARDROP, II, WILLIAM J. FISHER III, TODD R. DICKINSON, WARDROP & WARDROP, P.C., DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC, FISHER & DICKINSON, P.C., 900 MONROE LLC, 940 MONROE LLC, PIONEER INCORPORATED, CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, JOHN H. LOGIE, and FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, Defendants, and DYKEMA EXCAVATORS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of April 7, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration. 3 WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows: For the reasons stated in my dissent to the order in this matter which issued April 7, 2006, I would grant reconsideration and deny leave to appeal. 474 Mich 1104 (2006) (Weaver, J., dissenting). I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 31, 2006 _________________________________________ d0724 Clerk