Legal Research AI

Hamilton v. BANK ONE NAT. ASS'N

Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Date filed: 2006-03-29
Citations: 711 N.W.2d 81, 474 Mich. 1099
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
Order                                                                                       Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                  Lansing, Michigan

  March 29, 2006                                                                                        Clifford W. Taylor,
                                                                                                                Chief Justice

  130774 & (48)                                                                                       Michael F. Cavanagh
                                                                                                      Elizabeth A. Weaver
                                                                                                             Marilyn Kelly
                                                                                                        Maura D. Corrigan
  F. TIMBERLANE HAMILTON,                                                                             Robert P. Young, Jr.
            Plaintiff-Appellant,                                                                      Stephen J. Markman,
                                                                                                                     Justices

  v      	                                                         SC: 130774      

                                                                   COA: 265062       

                                                                   Kent CC: 05-001514-NZ 

  BANK ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

  HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, HESS HESS 

  & HESS, TROTT & TROTT, TCIF, 

            Defendants-Appellees.

  _________________________________________/

        On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.
  The application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is
  considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented
  should be reviewed by this Court.




                          I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                          March 29, 2006                      _________________________________________
         l0329                                                                Clerk