Garrett v. Sam H. Goodman Bldg. Co., Inc.

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan December 8, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128951 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan NANCY GARRETT, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellant, Stephen J. Markman, Justices v SC: 128951 COA: 251793 Wayne CC: 02-226727-NI SAM H. GOODMAN BUILDING COMPANY, INC., and DONALD BRYANT, d/b/a D & B CEMENT, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the Court of Appeals affirmance of the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant Goodman Building, and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further proceedings. Summary disposition should not have been granted for defendant Goodman Building because it did not move for summary disposition. Further, summary disposition based on the “open and obvious” doctrine was improper because neither defendant was the premises possessor. Ghaffari v Turner Constr Co, 473 Mich 16, 23 (2005). The Court of Appeals erred in applying Fultz v Union-Commerce Associates, 470 Mich 460 (2004), to defendant Goodman Building because it and plaintiff were in contractual privity. In all further respects, leave to appeal is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 8, 2005 _________________________________________ t1201 Clerk