IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-20293
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL ALOYSIUS, also known as
Michael Amadi,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. CR-H-93-0250
- - - - - - - - - -
February 2, 1996
Before JOHNSON, KING, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Aloysius appeals from his judgment of conviction and
the district court's denial of his motion for new trial.
Aloysius argues that the search of his bedroom violated the
Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable search and
seizures, that the district court erred by refusing to suppress
his oral statements to government agents after he was taken into
custody, that government agents lacked reasonable suspicion to
conduct a nonroutine border search of his briefcase at the
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-20293
-2-
airport, that the evidence was insufficient to support his
convictions, that the district court abused its discretion by
denying his motion for new trial based upon newly discovered
evidence, that the district court abused its discretion by
denying his motion for a continuance, that the district court's
alleged racial comments against Nigerians constituted reversible
error, that the district court erred by failing to instruct the
jury on the definition of the term "willfully," and that the
district court's reasonable-doubt instruction was in error. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.