In Re McFadden

FOR THE RESPONDENT           FOR THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT
                                       DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION

Frank J. Gray                Donald R. Lundberg, Executive Secretary
800 Standard Federal Plaza        Robert C. Shook, Staff Attorney
Fort  Wayne,  IN   46801         115  West  Washington  Street,  Ste.   1060
                             Indianapolis, IN  46204
______________________________________________________________

      IN THE

      SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA

IN THE MATTER OF             )
                                  )  Case No. 02S00-9904-DI-226
JAMES B. McFADDEN            )
_____________________________________________________________________

      DISCIPLINARY ACTION
____________________________________________________________________


                                May 26, 2000


Per Curiam


      James B. McFadden was a county deputy prosecuting attorney when he was
convicted of public intoxication.  We conclude that his  actions  warrant  a
public reprimand.
      This attorney disciplinary matter now comes  before  this  Court  upon
Respondent McFadden and the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary  Commission’s
Statement  of  Circumstances  and  Conditional  Agreement   for   Discipline
tendered in contemplated resolution of this matter.
      The parties have stipulated that during relevant times, the respondent
was employed as a deputy prosecuting attorney for Allen County.  On May  28,
1998,  the  respondent  pleaded  guilty  to  and  was  convicted  of  public
intoxication,  a  Class  B  misdemeanor,  in  the  Whitley  Superior  Court.
Thereafter, he was suspended  from  the  Allen  County  Prosecutor’s  Office
without pay until the disposition of his case and then completed a  one-year
probationary period imposed by his employer  as  a  condition  of  continued
employment.
         The parties agree,  and  we  find,  that  the  respondent  violated
Ind.Professional  Conduct  Rule  8.4(d),   which   provides   that   it   is
professional  misconduct  for  a  lawyer  to  engage  in  conduct  that   is
prejudicial to the administration of justice.  When the  law  is  broken  by
one whose job it is  to  enforce  the  law,  the  public  rightly  questions
whether the judicial system is worthy  of  respect.   Matter  of  Sims,  665
N.E.2d 584  (Ind. 1996).
      In mitigation, it is  noted  in  the  agreement  that  the  respondent
immediately  accepted  responsibility  for  his  conduct  and   successfully
completed a court-ordered counseling program.    He has served as  a  deputy
prosecuting attorney for over ten years  and  prior  to  becoming  a  deputy
prosecuting attorney served as  an  officer  in  the  United  States  Marine
Corps.  He has no prior disciplinary record with this Court.   In  light  of
all of the above considerations, we conclude that a public reprimand  is  an
appropriate discipline in this case, and, accordingly, accept  the  parties’
tendered agreement.
      It is, therefore, ordered that the respondent, James B.  McFadden,  is
hereby reprimanded and admonished for the misconduct set forth herein.
      The Clerk of this Court is directed to provide notice of this order in
accordance with Admis.Disc. R. 23(3)(d) and to  provide  the  clerk  of  the
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the  clerk  of  each
of the Federal District Courts in this state, and the clerk  of  the  United
States Bankruptcy Court in  this  state  with  the  last  known  address  of
respondent as reflected  in  the  records  of  the  Clerk.   Costs  of  this
proceeding are assessed against respondent.